Explicating a Composite Theodicy in the School of Mirza Mahdi al-Isfahani: The Case of Mohammad-Hossein Assar

Document Type : Original Research

Author
Iranian Research Institute of Philosophy (IRIP)
10.30497/prr.2026.248287.2014
Abstract
This article presents a critical exposition of the theodicy of natural evil as formulated by Mohammad Hossein Assar, a prominent contemporary thinker within the School of Mirza Mahdi Isfahani. Assar constructs a theological framework that deliberately eschews the ontological foundations of Sadrian philosophy. The cornerstone of his argument is a radical semantic and ontological redefinition of "natural" versus "moral" evil. He delineates a tripartite typology—purely natural, purely moral, and hybrid—whereby he defines purely natural evil as an axiologically neutral, ontic (takwīnī) event. This re-conceptualization allows him to assert that the divine creation of such phenomena is entirely consistent with God’s benevolence. Assar’s solution culminates in a composite theodicy integrating three distinct strands of thought. At its core is a "Hidden Reasons" theodicy, which posits that the ultimate divine wisdom (ḥikmah) behind natural suffering remains largely inaccessible to human cognition, apart from that which God reveals. This foundation is augmented by, first, an extended Libertarian framework that uniquely implicates creaturely free will in the genesis of all natural evils, and second, a doctrine of "Conditional Divine Benevolence," which contends that God’s goodwill is not universally or unconditionally bestowed upon all humankind.
Keywords
Subjects


Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 07 June 2026