The Reasonableness of Pragmatic Faith in God as A Transcendent Value from Joshua Golding’s Viewpoint

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
Mahboobeh Pakdel 1
Abbas Yazdani 2
1 Ph. D. Student in Philosophy of Religion, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Philosophy of Religion, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
10.30497/prr.2024.244576.1839
Abstract
Joshua Golding, by appealing to faith in God as a finite but transcendent value, develops a new formulation of the pragmatic arguments. Golding argues that the potential value of attaining a good relationship with God is transcendent and a religious way of life is more likely than a nonreligious way of life to result in attaining a good relationship with God. In addition, Golding’s version aims to replace Pascal’s problem with a finite but transcendent value and justify that it is pragmatically rational for a person to pursue a religious way of life. Since Golding claims that the pragmatic value of choosing faith in God is higher than nonreligious choices, this paper attempts to defend his claim. Due to the position of the Axiology of Theism in this issue, the present paper examines both Pro-theism and Anti-theism arguments. This review shows that the Anti-theism claim in impersonal scope is not plausible and in personal one, which is based on the meaning of life argument is not defensible. Moreover, Proponents of the Divine Hiddenness by rebutting the Axiology of Theism also pose a challenge to Anti-theism arguments. Therefore, regarding Pro-theism arguments, God, as a perfectly moral good being, necessarily adds value to any state of affairs in which God exists. Hence, Golding’s pragmatic argument in claiming that attaining a good relationship with God is of value can be defended.
Keywords
Joshua Golding
Guy Kahane
pragmatic argument
the good relationship with God
transcendent value
axiology of theism
Subjects
Cottingham, John. 2005. The Spiritual Dimension: Religion, Philosophy and Human Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Golding, Joshua L. 1990. “Toward a Pragmatic Conception of Religious Faith.” Faith and Philosophy 7 (4).
Golding, Joshua L. 2019. “Prudential/Pragmatic Arguments: Theism” in Theism and Atheism Opposing Arguments in Philosophy, edited by Joseph W. Koterski, S. J. & Graham Oppy. New York: Macmillan.
Kahane, Guy. 2011. “Should We Want God to Exist?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXXXII (3).
Kahane, Guy. 2012. “The Value Question in Metaphysics.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXXXV (1).
Lougheed, Kirk. 2021. “Introduction to the Axiology of Theism: The Current Debate and Future Directions” in Four Views on the Axiology of Theism What Difference Does God Make?, edited by Kirk Lougheed. Bloomsbury Academic.
Metz, T. 2015. “Fundamental Conditions of Human Existence as the Ground of Life’s Meaning: Reply to Landau.” Religious Studies 51(1).
Palmer, Michael F. 2001. The Question of God: An Introduction and Sourcebook. London and New York: Routledge.
Pascal, Blaise. 2008. “Pensées (Thoughts)" in Pensées (Thoughts) and Other Writings, translated by Honor Levi. New York: Oxford Press.
Peterson, M. L. 1998. God and Evil: An Introduction to the Issues. Westview Press.
Schellenberg, John L. 1993. Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason. Cornell University Press.
Schellenberg, John L. 2018. “Triple Transcendence, the Value of God’s Existence, and a New Route to Atheism.” in Does God Matter? Essays on the Axiological Consequences of Theism, edited by Klaas J. Kraay. London and New York: Routledge.
Schellenberg, John L. 2019. “Does Divine Hiddenness Justify Atheism?” in Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion, edited by Michael Peterson and Raymond J. VanAragon. Wiley-Blackwell.
Wolf, Susan. 1997. “Meaning and Morality.” in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wolf, Susan. 2010. Meaning in Life and why it Matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.