Explanation of Spinoza’s Arguments for the Unity of God and Reconstruction of Ethics’ Proof

Document Type : Original Research

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy of Religion, Religions and Mysticism, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran.

Abstract

Spinoza’s philosophy may be classified among the forms of philosophical theism, in the sense that it affirms the existence of God and regards God as absolutely one. However, the conception of God that Spinoza offers is by no means identical with that of the theologians and philosophers in the classical Abrahamic tradition. Throughout his works, Spinoza presents several arguments to demonstrate the unity of God or the divine substance. In this paper, using a descriptive-analytical method, we present and explicate these arguments. Most of them are grounded in the notions of “absolute perfection” and “necessity of existence”. Some of these arguments do not deny a plurality of substances and merely affirm the unity of the divine substance, whereas others aim to prove that the divine substance is the only existing and conceivable substance—that is, strict substance monism. We also argue that Spinoza’s proof of God in the Ethics, if formulated in its conventional manner, is not conclusive. Therefore, by appealing to the distinction between “absolute infinity” and “infinity of a kind”, we propose a more coherent reconstruction of that proof. In expounding the major arguments, we also trace their conceptual antecedents among medieval Jewish, Christian, and Islamic philosophers.

Keywords

Main Subjects

The Holy Bible.
Allison, Henry. 1987. Benedict de Spinoza: An Introduction. Yale University Press.
Aquinas, Thomas. 2014. Summa Theologiae. Trans by the Fathers of the Dominican Province. Catholic Way.
Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works. Vol I & II. Trans by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton.
Augustine. 2011. The Trinity. Trans by Edmund Hill. New City Press.
Basile, P. F. 2012. “Russell on Spinoza’s Substance Monism.” Metaphysics 13(1): 27-41.
Bennett, Jonathan. 1984. A Study of Spinoza's Ethics; Indianapolis.
Bennett, Jonathan. 1996. “Spinoza’s Metaphysics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, edited by D. Garrett. Cambridge.
Carierro, John. 2002. “Monism in Spinoza.” In Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes, edited by Koistinen & Biro. Oxford.
Charlton, William. 1981. “Spinoza's Monism.The Philosophical Review 90(4): 503-529.
Curley, Edwin. 1988. Behind the Geometrical Method. Princeton University Press.
Delahunty, R. G. 1985. Spinoza. Routledge.
Della Rocca, Michael. 2002. “Spinoza’s Substance Monism.” In Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes, edited by koistinen & Biro. Oxford.
Descartes, Rene. 1984. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes (CSM1). Vol 1. Trans by Cottingham & Stoothoff & Murdoch. Cambridge.
Descartes, Rene. 1985. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes (CSM2). Vol. 2. Trans by Cottingham & Stoothoff & Murdoch. Cambridge.
Descartes, Rene. 2006. Meditationes de Prima Philosophia. Translated by Ahmad Ahmadi. Tehran: SAMT Publications. [In Persian]
Donagan, Alan. 1980. “Spinoza’s Dualism.” In The Philosophy of Baruch Spinoza, edited by R. Kennington. Washington.
Garrett, Don. 1990. “Ethics: Ip5.” In Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy, edited by Cover and Kulstad. Hackett.
Gilson, Etienne. 2018. John duns Scotus. Trans by Games Colbert. T&T Clark.
Gueroult, Martial. 1968. Spinoza I. Dieu. Aubier-Montaigne.
Gullan-Whur, Margaret. 2000. Within Reason: A Life of Spinoza. Jonathan Cape Publishing.
Hilli, Hasan ibn Yusuf. 2001. Kashf al-Murad. Edited by Hasan Hasanzadeh. Qom: Muʾassasa al-Nashr al-Islami. [In Arabic]
Hesamifar, Abdurrazzaq. 2006. “Arguments for the Existence of God in Spinoza's Works.” Philosophy of Religion Research 4(2): 89-117. doi: https://doi.org/10.30497/prr.2012.1183 [In Persian]
Hesamifar, Abdurrazzaq, & Seyyed Masoud Seyf. 2016. “The Essence of God and the Distinction of His Attributes in Spinoza’s Philosophy.” Philosophy of Religion 13(1): 1-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.22059/jpht.2016.58587  [In Persian]
Kirk, G. S, J. E Raven, & M. Schofield. 1990. The Presocratic Philosophers. Cambridge.
Kulstadm, Mark. 1996. “Spinoza's Demonstration of Monism, A New Line of Defense.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 13(3): 299-316.
Laerkem Mognes. 2011. “Spinoza’s Monism? What Monism?”. In Spinoza on Monism, edited by Philip Goff. Palgrave Macmillan.
Leibniz, G. W. 1989. Philosophical Papers and Letters. Trans by Leroy Loemker. Boston.
Maimonides, N. d. Dilala al-Haʾirin. Edited by Hosein Atai. Cairo: Maktaba al-Thaqafa al-Diniyya. [In Arabic]
Mason, Richard. 1997. The God of Spinoza. Cambridge.
Melamed, Yitzhak. 2011. “Why Spinoza is not an Eleatic Monist (or Why Diversity Exists).” In Spinoza on Monism, edited by P. Goff. Palgrave.
Mir Damad, Muhammad Baqir. 2006. Taqwim al-Iman wa Sharhuhu Kashf al-Haqaʾiq. Edited by Ali Ujabi. Tehran: Miras-i Maktub. [In Arabic]
Nadler, Steven. 2006. Spinoza’s Ethics: An Introduction. Cambridge.
Newlands, Samuel. 2010. “Another Kind of Spinozistic Monism.” Nous 44(3): 469-502.
Pollok, Frederick. 1966. Spinoza: His Life and Philosophy. New York.
Shayanfar, Shahnaz, & Mohammad Saeidi Mehr. 2013. “Review of Transcendence and Immanence in the Philosophy of Spinoza from the Viewpoint of Islamic Mysticism.” Journal of Religious Thought 9(31): 31-58. doi: https://doi.org/10.22099/jrt.2013.1249 [In Persian]
Spinoza, Baruch. 1997. Ethics. Translated by Mohsen Jahangiri. Tehran: Markaz-i Nashr-i Danishgahi. [In Persian]
Spinoza, Benedict. 1985. The Collected Works of Spinoza. Vol. 1. Translated by Edwin Curley. Princeton.
Spinoza, Benedict. 2002. Complete Works. Trans by Samuel Shirley. Cambridge.
Talebzadeh, Hamid, & Hossein Saberi Varzaneh. 2015. “Spinoza’s Critiques of Anthropomorphism of God.” Philosophy 12(2): 73-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.22059/jop.2015.54164 [In Persian]
Wolfson, Harry. 1934. The Philosophy of Spinoza. 2 Vols. Harvard.
Zac, Sylvian. 1991. “On the Idea of Creation in Spinoza’s Philosophy.” In God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics, edited by Y. Yovel. Vol 1. Leiden.