Document Type : Original Research

Authors

• Morteza Peirojafari ¹
• Vahideh Fakhar Noghani ²
• Jahangir Masoudi ³

¹ Ph. D. Graduate in Islamic Teachings, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

² Associate Professor, Department of Islamic Teachings, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

³ Professor, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Wisdom, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Comparative theology, as a new approach in theology, seeks to have a constructive encounter with other religions and theologies and to gain a deep understanding through comparison and adaptation with other religions. The process of this understanding in comparative theology requires a proper context and strategy to achieve the goals of this theology. In this paper, based on Gadamer's hermeneutic principles, the hermeneutic strategies of comparative theology are examined and analyzed. The result of this analysis indicates considerable affinities between Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics and comparative theology such as the infinity of understanding, the fusion of horizons, the game of understanding, the understanding of self through the understanding of the "other", the acceptance of prejudice as an integral part of the flow of understanding, and finally the enrichment of one’s theology through the understanding “other’s” theology. According to this result, the phenomenon of understanding in comparative theology can be explained based on Gadamerian hermeneutics. In general, Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics can result in the development of comparative theology and its achievements. Comparative theology, in addition to adopting the original and traditional meanings of religious teachings and rituals, is based on a dynamic understanding of religious traditions and also a hermeneutic flexibility of religious doctrines.

Keywords

• comparative theology
• philosophical hermeneutics
• Gadamer
• understanding
• prejudice
• fusion of horizons

Main Subjects

• Religious Epistemology