A Rereading of Thomas Nigel's View of the Meaning of Life Based on the Function of Life

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
Mohamad Mahdi Sotude 1
Mohammad Reza Bayat 2
1 Master of Philosophy of Religion, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy of Religion, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
10.30497/prr.2022.241221.1689
Abstract
The contemporary analytic philosopher, Thomas Nagel, contends that the strong human disposition to harmonize with the universe raises a genuine question as to the relationship of human beings with the whole existence. This question, in his mind, ought to be answered, because answering this question is a path that might lead to an explanation of the meaningfulness of human lives and, subsequently, to the deliverance from the emptiness of life. In search for an answer to the question, Nagel explores the views of Hume, Kant, Sidgwick, Sartre, Nietzsche, Plato, and the shared teachings of religions, coming up with answers none of which he finds satisfactory. Accordingly, he decides that the question has no apposite response and, as a result, life is meaningless. Explicating Nagel's view as well as his critiques of the answers of the philosophers and religions, this article tries to show that: Firstly, one can, having Nagel's pressing question in mind, work out a theory of meaning of life based on the function of human life. Secondly, contrary to what he thinks, some of the philosophical and religious responses are acceptable. Thirdly, although one can explain the function of mankind's life drawing on the favorable philosophical and religious responses, these responses can be of no help in forming a judgement as to the function of each human individual's life; such a judgement is possible only when a full sight of the individual's life is accessible and this happens only after the termination of the individual's life. Finally, even if all philosophical and religious answers to Nagel's question are rejected, one can still defend the meaning of each human being's life. This is because the meaningfulness of each individual's life is not exclusively contingent on answering Nagel's question, rather, it is defensible based on the function of the person's life in relation to some collections that are smaller than the whole existence and possess some valuable objectives.
Keywords
Thomas Nigel
Meaning of Life
Objective Perspective
Religious Temperament
Function of Life
باربور، ایان. 1379. علم و دین. ترجمۀ بهاءالدین خرمشاهی. تهران: نشر دانشگاهی.
بیات، محمدرضا. 1394. دین و معنای زندگی در فلسفه تحلیلی. قم: دانشگاه ادیان و مذاهب.
دلوز، ژیل. 1390. نیچه و فلسفه. ترجمه لیلا کوچک‌منش. تهران: رخداد نو.
کورنر، اشتفان. 1367. فلسفه کانت. ترجمۀ عزت‌الله فولادوند. تهران: خوارزمی.
طباطبایی، محمدحسین. 1393. بررسی‌های اسلامی، ج. 1. قم: بوستان کتاب.
افلاطون. 1398. دورۀ آثار افلاطون، ج. 3. ترجمه محمدحسن لطفی. تهران: خوارزمی.
نیچه، فریدریش. 1381. فریدریش نیچه و گزین‌گونه‌هایش. ترجمه و تدوین پریسا رضایی و رضا نجفی. تهران: مروارید.
نیگل، تامس. 1382. «پوچی». ترجمه حمید شهریاری. نقد و نظر 29-30: 92-107.
نیگل، تامس. 1397. پرسش‌های کشنده. ترجمه مصطفی ملکیان و جواد حیدری. تهران: نگاه معاصر.
هایدگر، مارتین. 1388. نیچه. ترجمه ایرج قانونی. تهران: آگه.
De Duve, Christian. 2002. Life Evolving: Molecules, Mind, and Meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.
Edwards, Psul. 1967. "Meaning and Value of Life." In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol.4, edited by Paul Edwards. New York: McMillan.
Greene, John C. 1959. "Darwin and Religion." Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 103(5): 716-725.
Higgins, Kathleen Marie .1994. "On the Genealogy of Morals—Nietzsche's Gift." Pp. 49-62, in Nietzsche, Genealogy, Morality: Essays on Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morals. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.
Hume, David. 1989. Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and the Principles of Morals. Edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge and P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 1785. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nielsen, Kai. 1981. "Linguistic Philosophy and the Meaning of Life." In  The Meaning of Life, edited by E. D. Klemeke. New York: Oxford University Press.
Metz, Thaddeus. 2007. New Developments in the Meaning of life. Philosophical Compass.
Nagel, Thomas. 1971. "The absurd." The Journal of Philosophy 68(20): 716-727.
Nagel, Thomas. 2010. Secular Philosophy and the Religious Temperament. Oxford University Press.
Nozick, Robert. 1981. Philosophical Explanation. Harvard University Press.
Sartre, Jean Paul. 1995. Being and Nothingness: An Essay in Phenomenological Ontology. Translated by Hazel Barnes. London: Routledge.
Sidgwick, Henry. 2001. The Methods of Ethics. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Philosophy of Religion Research
Volume 19, Issue 2 - Serial Number 38
November 2022
Pages 177-200