Philosophy of Religion Research

The Flicker of Freedom in Defense of the Principle of Alternative Possibilities

Document Type : Original Research

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Philosophy of Ethics Department, Research Center for Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Islamic Sciences and Culture Academy, Qom, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Thought, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran.

Abstract

According to the principle of alternative possibilities, an agent is only morally responsible if he could have acted differently as a decision-maker or as an actor. Frankfurt emphasizes, by contrast, that there are cases in which, although a person is not forced to make a decision or take action, it is impossible for him/her to avoid doing so, and yet the agent is morally responsible. The flicker of freedom and the dilemmatic argument are two of the philosophers' most important responses to the Frankfurt model in which he rejects the principle of alternative possibilities. According to the flicker of freedom strategy, the Frankfurt-Style examples do not eliminate all alternative possibilities, and there are still flickers of freedom. In other words, in a Frankfurt-Style example, even though the agent lacks the ordinary choices due to the presence of an intervener, he/she actually has a limited number of alternative choices, which seems to justify his moral responsibility. Fisher and Stump's robustness objection is the most important obstacle to advancing this strategy, which does not seem effective enough in defending the Frankfurt-style examples.

Keywords

ملاصدرا، محمد بن ابراهیم. 1981 م. الحکمه المتعالیه فی الأسفار العقلیه الاربعه، ج. ۶. بیروت: دار احیاء التراث العربی.
Chisholm, Roderick. 1982. “Human Freedom and the Self.” In Free Will, edited by Gary Watson. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dennett, Daniel C. 1984. Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will,Worth, Wanting. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Fischer, John Martin. 1985-86. “Responsibility and Failure.” In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 86: 260-268.
Fischer, John Martin. 2001. “Freedom and Determinism.” In Encyclopedia of Ethics, vol. 2, 2nd edition, edited by Lawrence C. Becker and Charlotte B. Becker. New York and London: Routledge.
Fischer, John Martin. 2006. My Way: Essays on Moral Responsibility.New York: Oxford University Press.
Fischer, John Martin. 1994. The Metaphysics of Free Will. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
Frankfurt, Harry. 1969. “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibilities.” Journal of Philosophy 66: 829-39.
McKenna, Michael S. 1997. “Alternative Possibilities and the Failure of the Counterexample Strategy.” Journal of Social Philosophy 28: 71–85.
Mckenna, Michael. 2006. “Robustness, Control, and the Demand for Morally Significant Alternatives: Frankfurt Examples with Oodles and Oodles of Alternatives.” In Moral Responsibility and Alternative Possibilities: Essays on the Importance of Alternative Possibilities, edited by David Widerker and Michael McKenna. Aldershot. UK: Ashgate.
Naylor, Margery Bedford. 1984. “Frankfurt on the Principle of Alternate Possibilities.” Philosophical Studies 46.
O’Connor, Timothy. 2000. Persons and Causes: The Metaphysics of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pereboom, Derk. 2003. Living without Free Will. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, M. 2012. “Modified Frankfurt-type Examples and the Flickers of Freedom.” Philosophical Studies 157: 177–194.
Speak, D. 2002. “Fanning the Flickers of Freedom.” American Philosophical Quarterly 39: 91–105.
Stump, E. 1996. “Libertarian Freedom and the Principle of Alternative Possibilities.” In Faith, Freedom, and Rationality, edited by J. Jordan and D. Howard-Snyder.  Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
van Inwagen, Peter. 1978. “Ability and Responsibility.” Philosophical Review 87.
van Inwagen, Peter. 1986. An Essay on Free Will. Oxford University Press.
Wyma, K. 1997. “Moral Responsibility and Leeway for Action.” American Philosophical Quarterly 34.    
Zimmerman, Michael J. 1988. An Essay on Moral Responsibility. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield.
Philosophy of Religion Research
Volume 19, Issue 2 - Serial Number 38
November 2022
Pages 161-175