Philosophy of Religion Research

On God’s Knowledge of Counterfactuals of Freedom

Document Type : Original Research

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Philosophy of Religion, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS), Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy of Science, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy of Religion, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS), Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

To answer the problem of incompatibility between divine providence and creaturely freedom, Molinism suggests the theory of middle knowledge, a theory that claims by assuming God’s knowledge of counterfactuals of freedom, we can resolve the problem without giving up neither divine providence nor creaturely freedom. Through His knowledge of the conditionals and actualizing their antecedents, He knows what creatures will freely do. In this way, God’s foreknowledge and sovereignty can be compatible with creatures’ freedom. The present paper attempts to show that there is a sort of incoherency in Molinism. For, while Molinism presupposes divine immutability thesis, it attributes a will to God that requires moving from possibility to actuality in divine nature. We argue that because counterfactuals of freedom need to be actualized by divine will, claiming God's knowledge of counterfactuals of freedom leads to a rejection of divine immutability thesis which makes Molinism incoherent. We conclude that the proposed objection to the theory of God’s middle knowledge of counterfactuals of freedom is a crucial objection regardless of the success of its proponents in answering the objections concerning the truth-makers of such counterfactuals.

Keywords

Allen, Sophie. 2016. “Properties.” in The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (IEP).
Azadegan, Ebrahim. 2020. “On the incompatibility of God's knowledge of particulars and the doctrine of divine immutability: towards a reform in Islamic theology.” Religious Studies: 1-18.
Basinger, David. 1984. “Divine omniscience and human freedom: A middle knowledge perspective.” Faith and Philosophy 1(3): 291-302.
Craig, William Lane. 2001. “The Middle Knowledge view.” Pp. 119-161, in Divine Foreknowledge: Four Views, edited by James K. Beiiby and Paul R. Eddy. InterVarsity Press.
Flint, Thomas P. 1998. Divine providence: The Molinist account. Cornell University Press.
Hasker, William. 1986. “A refutation of middle knowledge.” Nous 20(4): 545-557.
Hasker, William. 1989. God, time, and knowledge. Cornell University Press.
Hasker, William. 1995. “Middle knowledge: A refutation revisited.” Faith and Philosophy 12(2): 223-236.
Hunt, David. 2001. “The simple foreknowledge view.” Pp. 65-103, in Divine Foreknowledge: Four Views, edited by James K Beiiby and Paul R Eddy. InterVarsity Press.
Kane, Robert. 2007. “Libertarianism.” Pp. 5-43, in Four views on free will, by John Martin Fischer, Robert Kane, Derk Pereboom, Manuel Vargas. Wiley-Blackwell.
Molina, Luis de. 1988. On Divine Foreknowledge: Part IV of the Concordia. Translated by Alfred J. Freddoso. Cornell University Press.
Laing, John D. 2005. “Middle knowledge.” in  The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (IEP).
Laing, John D. 2018. Middle Knowledge: Human Freedom in Divine Sovereignty. Kregel Academic.
Leftow, Brian. 2014. “Immutability.” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Pawl, Timothy. 2009. “Divine immutability.” In The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (IEP).
Stump, Eleonore. 2019. “The Openness of God: Eternity and Free Will,” Pp. 21-37, in Philosophical Essays Against Open Theism, edited by Benjamin H. Arbour. Routledge.
Vicens, Leigh C. 2014. “Theological Determinism.” In The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (IEP).
Vicens, Leigh C. and Simon Kittle. 2019. God and Human Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Philosophy of Religion Research
Volume 19, Issue 1 - Serial Number 37
May 2021
Pages 183-205