Polkinghorn's New Model For God's Relationship with the World based on Criticism of Thomistic Traditional Conception of God

Document Type : Original Research

Author

Ph.D. student of the philosophy of religion, Faculty of theology and Islamic teachings, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The necessity of consideration and usage of the modern sciences is the core of John Polkinginghorn's approach to theological problems. Although he is generally committed to a personal, sublime, and distinct conception of God, which can be ascertained in Thomistic well-known conception of God, he criticizes this Thomistic conception. The main focus of his critiques is God's active relationship with the world and creatures, especially human beings. In this article, after citing Pokinghorn's critique of the Thomistic model, his new model has been introduced. Being stemmed from the capacities of modern physics, especially information causality, this model stays far from the problems of the Thomistic model. His model, in addition to allowing the role of God's eternal creation, leaves room for the Lordship and the influence of God's Will in the universe. In the end, we will evaluate Palkinghorne's view, which has three aspects: scientific, religious, and philosophical.

Keywords

باربور، ایان. 1392. دین و علم. ترجمه پیروز فطورچی. تهران: پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و اندیشه اسلامی.
زارع، روزبه. 1396. «فعل خداوند در طبیعت: طرح و بررسی دیدگاه جان پوکینگهورن». جستارهای فلسفه دین  6(2).
 
Aquinas, St. Thomas. 2018. Summa Theologica: First Part of the Second Part. [S.l.]: Devoted Publishing.
Carroll, William E. 2008. “Divine Agency, Contemporary Physics, and the Autonomy of Nature.” The Heythrop Journal 49 (4): 582–602.
Polkinghorne, John. 1998. Belief in God in the Age of Science. Yale: Yale University Press.
Polkinghorne, John. 2000. “Science and Theology in the Twenty-First Century.” Zygon 35 (4): 941–53.
Polkinghorne, John. 2005. Science and Providence. Phiadeiphia and London: SPCK Tempelton Foundation Press.
Polkinghorne, John. 2006. Science and the Trinity: The Christian Encounter with Reality. New Haven: Yale Univerisity Press.
Polkinghorne, John. 2007. “Space, Time, and Causality.” Zygon 41 (4): 975–84.
Polkinghorne, John. 2009a. “The Metaphysics of Divine Action.” In Philosophy, Science and Divine Action, edited by F. LeRon Shults, Nancey C. Murphy, and Robert J. Russell. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
Polkinghorne, John. 2009b. Theology in the Context of Science. Yale: Yale University Press.
Silva, Ignacio. 2011. “Thomas Aquinas Holds Fast: Objections To Aquinas Within Today’s Debate On Divine Action.” The Heythrop Journal 54 (4): 1–10.
Velde, Rudi A. te. 2006. Aquinas on God: The “divine Science” of the Summa Theologiae. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.