The Consequences of Wittgenstein's Later Views for Religion and Religious Belief

Document Type : Original Research

Authors

1 PhD of Philosophy of Religion and New Theological Problems, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

2 Associate Professor at the Department of Philosophy of Religion, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This article concentrates on the later Wittgenstein. The main problem is how we can apply his later philosophical thought to religion and religious belief. The result is that, according to Wittgenstein, religious beliefs are not such as scientific hypotheses and need not being supported by rational arguments and evidence, but they are pictures on which believers arrange and set out their forms of life. So, according to the article, Wittgenstein neither accepts nor rejects language game of religion. He just says that this form of life exists and has its limits and prejudices. Religion, like any other conceptual schemata, logically depends on bounds and frontiers or, in better words, on social or contextual rules. If this language game is to be played and adopted, we’ll have to adopt and follow such limits and rules.

Keywords

راسل، برتراند (1387ش)، تکامل فلسفی من، ترجمة نواب مقربی، تهران: انتشارات صراط.
همو (1384ش)، عرفان و منطق، ترجمة نجف دریابندری، تهران: انتشارات ناهید.
طلایی ماهان، محمّد (1386ش)، «بازسازی تفکّر کرکگور در مقولة ایمان»، نامة حکمت، سال پنجم، ش1.
کیوپیت، دان (1385ش)، دریای ایمان، ترجمة حسن کامشاد، تهران: طرح نو.
ویتگنشتاین، لودویگ (1379ش)، رسالة منطقی ـ فلسفی، ترجمة میر شمس­الدین ادیب سلطانی، تهران: انتشارات امیرکبیر.
همو (1381ش)، دربارة اخلاق و دین، ترجمة مالک حسینی و بابک عباسی، تهران: هرمس.
هادسون، دانالد (1381ش)، لودویگ ویتگنشتاین و ربط فلسفة او به باور دینی، ترجمة مصطفی ملکیان، تهران: انتشارات نگاه معاصر.
Amesbury, Richard (2009), “Fideism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/entries/fideism.
Bloor, David (1983), Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge, Macmillan and Columbia.
Dummet, Michael (1993), Origins of Analytic Philosophy, Ltd: Gerald Duckworthand Co.
Nielsen, Kai (1967), “Wittgensteian Fedeism”, Philosophy, Vol. 42, No 161, pp. 191-209.
Ibid (2007), the Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion, Chad Meister & Paul Copan (eds.), Routledge.
Nielsen, Kai & Phillips, D. Z. (2005), Wittgensteian Fedeism, London: SCM Press.
Malcolm, Norman (1984), Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Memoir, Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
Ibid (1994), Wittgenstein: A Religious Point of View?, Peter Winch (ed.), New York: Cornell University Press.
Putnam, H. (1992), Renewing Philosophy, Cambridge: Harward University Press.
Rhees, Rush (1984), Ludwig Wittgenstein: Personal Recolections, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Russell, Bertrand (1905), “On Denoting”, Mind, XIV, pp. 479-493
Russell, B & Copelston, F. C. (1964), “A debate on the existence of God”, The Existence of God, J. Hick (ed.), New York: Macmillan.
Winch, P. (1995), The Idea of a Social Science, 2nd edition, London: Routledge.
Wittgenstein, L. J. J. (1953), Philosophical Investigations, Blackwell Publishing.
Ibid (1966), Lectures and Conversations, C. Barret (ed.), Oxford.
Ibid (1984), Vermischte Bemerkungen, in: Werkausgabe Band 8, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.