Editorial

Author

• Seyyed Ali Alamolhoda

PhD student of Islamic Philosophy and Kalam, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Ibn- Roshd was finding fault with Avesina about proving Neccessarily Existent and dividing the neccessity to selfneccessity and unself- neccessity. He continued criticizing of Avesina in other three theological subjects, divine knowledge and miracle of prophets and incorporeality of God. Briefly we can say his critique of Avesina includes two points. First, the attiude of Avesina about these five subjects is growing on his creativity and his viewes don’t take root from Aristotle’s books. second, Avesina met with contradiction in his viewes. We have to consider that the theology of Islam and Moslem philosopheres is different from Aristotle. So Avesina and his followeres in Islamic philosophy creat new attiude in theology and the critique of Ibn- Roshd about his theology helps us to find important differences between Islamic theology and Aristotlian theology.

Keywords

• Ibn- Roshd
• Avesina
• neccessarily existent
• divine knowledge
• miracle
• self- neccessity
• unself- neccessity

20.1001.1.22286578.1386.5.1.6.0