<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Imam Sadiq University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Philosophy of Religion Research</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2228-6578</Issn>
				<Volume>16</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Apriori in Otto’s Notion of Religion and Mysticism</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Apriori in Otto’s Notion of Religion and Mysticism</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>87</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>107</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2327</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30497/prr.2018.2327</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Akarm</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ebrahimi</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD student in comparative philosophy, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Enshallah</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rahmati</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor at Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>25</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The article grapples with Otto’s idea of unity and diversity in Mysticism. On the one hand, he believes in the diversity of Mysticisms and, on the other hand, he contends that various forms of Mysticism can be considered as a united body. Various forms of Mysticism, as he asserts, is formed in a realm beyond different cultures, ethnic groups and lands. Otto claims that this can be explained by appealing to a realm beyond the empirical. In this article, I shall explore the roots and consequences of this idea. It will be shown that Otto’s idea has a Kantian point of departure. Besides, it is a Platonic as well as Lutheran idea. Finally, I will argue that, understood this way, there is room for a comparison between Otto’s idea and the idea of eternality of the self in Islamic philosophy.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The article grapples with Otto’s idea of unity and diversity in Mysticism. On the one hand, he believes in the diversity of Mysticisms and, on the other hand, he contends that various forms of Mysticism can be considered as a united body. Various forms of Mysticism, as he asserts, is formed in a realm beyond different cultures, ethnic groups and lands. Otto claims that this can be explained by appealing to a realm beyond the empirical. In this article, I shall explore the roots and consequences of this idea. It will be shown that Otto’s idea has a Kantian point of departure. Besides, it is a Platonic as well as Lutheran idea. Finally, I will argue that, understood this way, there is room for a comparison between Otto’s idea and the idea of eternality of the self in Islamic philosophy.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">The Holy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">The apriori</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Unity of Mysticism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Diversity of Mysticism</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://prrj.isu.ac.ir/article_2327_03255088ed63354a54e0e5ed957e9008.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
