<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Imam Sadiq University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Philosophy of Religion Research</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2228-6578</Issn>
				<Volume>14</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Omniscience and Divine Co-eternality</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Omniscience and Divine Co-eternality</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>83</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>103</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">1909</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30497/prr.2017.1909</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Enshallah</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rahmati</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The conflict between divine foreknowledge and human free will is a major controversy within theology and philosophy of religion. Needless to say, the proper notion of time and its relation to God is essential for coping with this conflict. Based on this notion, there are three solutions to the conflict including “indeterminacy of the future”, “unknowability of future free acts”, and “Timelessness of divine knowledge”.  In this paper, I shall begin by evaluation of the first two theories and show how they cannot settle the conflict. I shall, then, assess the third theory and show that it is the most successful one. Besides, the theories of some Christian philosophers like Thomas Aquinas, Anselm and Boethius are explained in light of the thoughts of Islamic philosophers, especially Qazi Saeed al-Qumi.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The conflict between divine foreknowledge and human free will is a major controversy within theology and philosophy of religion. Needless to say, the proper notion of time and its relation to God is essential for coping with this conflict. Based on this notion, there are three solutions to the conflict including “indeterminacy of the future”, “unknowability of future free acts”, and “Timelessness of divine knowledge”.  In this paper, I shall begin by evaluation of the first two theories and show how they cannot settle the conflict. I shall, then, assess the third theory and show that it is the most successful one. Besides, the theories of some Christian philosophers like Thomas Aquinas, Anselm and Boethius are explained in light of the thoughts of Islamic philosophers, especially Qazi Saeed al-Qumi.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Omniscience</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Human Free Will</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Timelessness</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Divine Co-eternality</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://prrj.isu.ac.ir/article_1909_0609154fa35b3194026346c9cac2a248.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
