<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Imam Sadiq University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Philosophy of Religion Research</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2228-6578</Issn>
				<Volume>14</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Epistemological value of Religious Experience: C. D. Broad Revisited</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Epistemological value of Religious Experience: C. D. Broad Revisited</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>47</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>67</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">1907</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30497/prr.2017.1907</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ghazaleh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hojjati</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD student in Philosophy of Religion, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0009-0002-6039-4681</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>15</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		    <Abstract>As William James, C. D. Broad attempted to approach the religious belief with an empirical view. Religious experiences, on his view, have epistemological value and they can be regarded as an evidence for the existence of God. Broad may be regarded among the first thinkers who attempt to argue for the existence of God on the basis of religious experience. His attempt followed by some philosophers such as Richard Swinburne, C. F. Davis and William Alston who discussed the religious experience from an epistemological point of view. Although Broad’s paper on “The Argument from Religious Experience” issued long time ago, it still seems that his argument in the paper is noteworthy. Considering the views from the defenders of the epistemic value of the religious experience and their responses to the critics, we can reform and strengthen the argument for the epistemological value of these experiences offered by C. D. Broad.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">As William James, C. D. Broad attempted to approach the religious belief with an empirical view. Religious experiences, on his view, have epistemological value and they can be regarded as an evidence for the existence of God. Broad may be regarded among the first thinkers who attempt to argue for the existence of God on the basis of religious experience. His attempt followed by some philosophers such as Richard Swinburne, C. F. Davis and William Alston who discussed the religious experience from an epistemological point of view. Although Broad’s paper on “The Argument from Religious Experience” issued long time ago, it still seems that his argument in the paper is noteworthy. Considering the views from the defenders of the epistemic value of the religious experience and their responses to the critics, we can reform and strengthen the argument for the epistemological value of these experiences offered by C. D. Broad.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Epistemological Value</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Argument from Religious Experience</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">C. D. Broad</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Richard Swinburne</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">C. F. Davis</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">William Alston</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://prrj.isu.ac.ir/article_1907_77369e37b2aa1404f416275183ab055f.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
